On Sep 28, 2014, at 9:15 PM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote:
> Would you be happier with that? I would be happier with a clean MERGE statement implementation in Postgres, yes. And yes, I have followed Postgres' agonizing debate over the years about the subject. But I personally think it has been framed in the wrong light since the very beginning and that Postgres has convince itself that it somehow cannot support MERGE. Therefore it will not. To paraphrase Ian Grigg [1], albeit in a different context: we fixed what we could, not what we should, because it was easier. Anyway, these where my 2¢. Remember, you asked for feedback :) [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/cryptography%40metzdowd.com/msg01276.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/B947073A-F9E1-4CFF-A9D3-C37ABC78CF96%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
