On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Dominic Rodger <dominicrod...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Another long time user here (at some point I'd love to make the jump to
> contributor, just need to find more time) - out of interest, is there a
> reason we don't use Travis? I wonder if that might help those with commit
> access, since pre-tested pull requests would mean you could have confidence
> that the tests at least pass. Apologies if this has been discussed before
> (there are a few contributors to this group called Travis, which made
> searching a bit tricky!).
>
>
We do have a CI server (a Jenkins install) - you can find it here:

http://ci.django-cms.org/job/Django/

We don't currently test every fork or pull request on GitHub, but that's
certainly an interesting idea, especially if we could get validation that a
pull request passes the full test suite.

I haven't spent any time messing around with Travis configuration to know
how hard this would be to set up -- and whether the build failures can be
communicated in an effective way. If you're looking for a way to
contribute, investigating the options here might be an interesting place to
start.

Yours,
Russ Magee %-)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.

Reply via email to