I tend to agree, in general, with the reply that there should be a function based api to cover the 80% use case, but in the case of Django's CBV's this is likely covered by the as_view method.
On Friday, June 1, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Victor Hooi <victorh...@gmail.com > (mailto:victorh...@gmail.com)> wrote: > > The reason for my post - is there anything from the Django core as a whole > > on this? What's the future roadmap like in terms of CBV's? Are there going > > to be any changes to it, or are we safe to assume things will be as they are > > now. > > > > > I think as a whole we're.... divided. Luke's opinions differ from > mine, and it's entirely unclear to me who's "right" or even if there's > a "right" to be had. And that's just the two of us! > > I think this might be a situation where we need some more feedback > from the community and some more time to decide what the right move > here is. > > So... what do *you* think? > > Jacob > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Django developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com > (mailto:django-developers@googlegroups.com). > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > (mailto:django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com). > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
