On 5/4/12, django-developers@googlegroups.com
<django-developers@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> =============================================================================
> Today's Topic Summary
> =============================================================================
>
> Group: django-developers@googlegroups.com
> Url: http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/topics
>
>   - Dogfood the new class-based views in contrib.syndication? [2 Updates]
>     http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/t/a053b1dffc037f8c
>   - GitHub migration done! [1 Update]
>     http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/t/f7ef8fe7b7b3c81b
>   - Test reordering and TransactionTestCase cleanup [4 Updates]
>     http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/t/3df2b4926eba08d2
>   - Will django escaping ever consider context of javascript and CSS? [2
> Updates]
>     http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/t/5bfb68e2a779fd6e
>   - Redesign of djangoproject.com? [1 Update]
>     http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/t/d97cbb49900e73b1
>
>
> =============================================================================
> Topic: Dogfood the new class-based views in contrib.syndication?
> Url: http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/t/a053b1dffc037f8c
> =============================================================================
>
> ---------- 1 of 2 ----------
> From: Stephen Burrows <stephen.r.burr...@gmail.com>
> Date: May 03 01:25AM -0700
> Url: http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/msg/89a77e9e77892264
>
> I was recently working with django's syndication framework, and noticed
> that it felt clunky in a lot of ways. For example, I can only access the
> request and the kwargs for the function during the
>
> ---------- 2 of 2 ----------
> From: Russell Keith-Magee <russ...@keith-magee.com>
> Date: May 04 08:28AM +0800
> Url: http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/msg/15952a367e410348
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Stephen Burrows
>> whether this is something that (generally speaking) people would be
>> interested in seeing. I tried checking the tracker and google for previous
>
>
> =============================================================================
> Topic: GitHub migration done!
> Url: http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/t/f7ef8fe7b7b3c81b
> =============================================================================
>
> ---------- 1 of 1 ----------
> From: Vinay Sajip <vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk>
> Date: May 03 03:43PM -0700
> Url: http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/msg/f01a7438c1354b54
>
>> mirror repo merge-incompatible with the current mirror (and all clones
>> of it). It's possible there will be no way to do that, in which case I
>> guess a new incompatible mirror is still better
>
>
> =============================================================================
> Topic: Test reordering and TransactionTestCase cleanup
> Url: http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/t/3df2b4926eba08d2
> =============================================================================
>
> ---------- 1 of 4 ----------
> From: Andreas Pelme <andr...@pelme.se>
> Date: May 03 06:29PM +0200
> Url: http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/msg/ebef3ca741a95843
>
> I am trying to run my Django test suite with an alternative test runner
> (py.test), and found some issues with test isolation.
>
> TransactionTestCase does currently not clean up after itself (i.e.
>
> ---------- 2 of 4 ----------
> From: "Anssi Kääriäinen" <anssi.kaariai...@thl.fi>
> Date: May 03 10:23AM -0700
> Url: http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/msg/82c31936f6946be3
>
>
>> Djangos default testrunner reorders the test suite to run all TestCase
>> tests before TransactionTestCases, which avoids this problem. I cannot
>> find this reordering documented anywhere, or even
>
> ---------- 3 of 4 ----------
> From: Karen Tracey <kmtra...@gmail.com>
> Date: May 03 03:17PM -0400
> Url: http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/msg/f0e12859a1ab9dbb
>
>
>> Djangos default testrunner reorders the test suite to run all TestCase
>> tests before TransactionTestCases, which avoids this problem. I cannot
>> find this reordering documented anywhere,
>
>
> ---------- 4 of 4 ----------
> From: Ramiro Morales <cra...@gmail.com>
> Date: May 03 05:14PM -0300
> Url: http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/msg/97e1c32e8610a069
>
>
>> TransactionTestCase does currently not clean up after itself (i.e. flush
>> the database), but instead assumes that the next test will flush the
>> database.
>> [...]
>
>> Djangos default testrunner
>
>
> =============================================================================
> Topic: Will django escaping ever consider context of javascript and CSS?
> Url: http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/t/5bfb68e2a779fd6e
> =============================================================================
>
> ---------- 1 of 2 ----------
> From: Tom Evans <tevans...@googlemail.com>
> Date: May 03 04:34PM +0100
> Url: http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/msg/bf8cf92a7a7bd1a8
>
>> doesn't help/protect.
>
>> Are there any remote chance of django escaping extending to other
>> contexts beside HTML?
>
> There is the built-in escapejs filter that works fine for making user
>
> ---------- 2 of 2 ----------
> From: Voulnet <voul...@gmail.com>
> Date: May 03 07:49PM +0300
> Url: http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/msg/ea8ecb7e154103a0
>
> The document you linked says it doesn't make it safe to use, but rather
> helps in fixing syntax errors.
>
> " escapejs
>
> Escapes characters for use in JavaScript strings. This does not make the
>
>
> =============================================================================
> Topic: Redesign of djangoproject.com?
> Url: http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/t/d97cbb49900e73b1
> =============================================================================
>
> ---------- 1 of 1 ----------
> From: Thiago Avelino <thiagoavelinos...@gmail.com>
> Date: May 03 01:29AM -0300
> Url: http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/msg/11fdb6cea4edc6b7
>
> Was very good work Hooshyar Naraghi.
>
> []'s
>
> --
> Thiago Avelino
> http://www.avelino.us
> http://www.twitter.com/avelino0
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Django developers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.

Reply via email to