On 17/03/2012, at 12:53 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:

> I think we need to come together and agree on an approach before we move 
> forward, so I'd like to see some concrete proposals for each of these 
> approaches. Since all options have merits and since I think it's unlikely 
> we'll find consensus I'm prepared to make a BDFL ruling here. So if you feel 
> strongly about one approach or another, please write a concrete proposal and 
> post it here or on the wiki. I'll look these over -- and also review Clay's 
> branch -- and (again, baring consensus) make a ruling next week.

To help this along, I've just summarized the state of this discussion on the 
wiki. 

https://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/ContribAuthImprovements

I've tried to keep my comments as objective as possible; if anyone feels I've 
misrepresented something, or missed an important point, feel free to weigh in 
with modifications. However, *please*: 

 * Keep it brief.
 * Keep it on topic.
 * Keep it objective. 

I'll be doing some weeding and pruning to make sure the document remains a 
useful historical summary of our design discussion (just like the similar 
documents we have for class-based views and contrib.messages). This means that 
any length, off-topic, or non-objective comments will be cut -- or at least 
heavily edited.

Yours,
Russ Magee %-)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.

Reply via email to