On 03/08/2012 08:19 AM, Łukasz Rekucki wrote: > On 8 March 2012 16:43, Aymeric Augustin > <aymeric.augus...@polytechnique.org> wrote: >> PEP 414 was accepted a few days ago. It's designed to make it easier to >> support 2.6, 2.7, 3.3+ on the same codebase. >> >> I hope we'll take advantage of this new feature in Django; however, that >> means a large update (if not a reboot) of the py3k branch. >> > > Why would you want to do that, when the py3k is already working with > unicode_literals ? That's a step backwards.
I agree with Łukasz; I support PEP 414 in general, but I'm not at all convinced that it makes sense to use it for Django's port, given that we already have a working port using the unicode_literals approach. Carl
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
