On 16 February 2012 16:02, Stan <stanislas.gue...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 9, 1:49 pm, zalew <zal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > We're going
>> > to solve that with our move to Git/GitHub, which will make it much
>> > easier for people to fork and much easier for core developers to
>> > integrate contributions.
>>
>> a bit offtopic: why nothttp://bitbucket.org?similar features, it's on
>> python/django and already popular in django community.

1) I can't argue about popularity, because I have no data, but most
Django applications I use come from github, so it's also quite
popular.

2) I don't think Django should care if the collaboration tool runs
python/django or java/grails as long as it's useful for developers.
Anything beyond that is politics and that's what DSF might care about
(I don't).

3) As for similar features... sometimes "similar" is not enough. I'm
not a regular Bitbucket user, so I maybe just didn't discover that,
but how can you add per line comments in patches on Bitbucket ?
Without that, code reviews for non-trivial patches is a real PITA.

-- 
Łukasz Rekucki

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.

Reply via email to