-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/29/2011 11:32 PM, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote: > I should not have said that this would be a good optimization, and > used the possible optimizations wording. I haven't got any performance > problems when using delete in 1.3. So from my point > of view the above mentioned optimization is mostly a theoretical > possibility. I did not mean the 1.3 version of deletion is bad at all.
No worries, I wasn't offended, just trying to be clear about the situation ;-) > If dependent object collection could be made a public API (with the > possibility of fetching all dependencies to depth N, not just cascaded > dependencies), it would be a nice feature for sure. If just the > cascades part would be made public, it would be great, too. Showing > "these objects will be deleted" confirmation page is not a feature > only admin needs. True enough. Making to-be-deleted collection a public API would just require some documentation, I think - the API is already there and the admin uses it. Carl -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7Wjj8ACgkQ8W4rlRKtE2fg5wCgqPcLgW0zr4yN8CkK+huEBoJf YGoAn2x6TaO6Me6bb6yHK2v834LtkWIR =nQ2M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
