On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:27 AM, ptone <pres...@ptone.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 1, 9:10 am, Luke Plant <l.plant...@cantab.net> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The Django deprecation timeline [1] is very inconsistent in its usage of
>> the terminology 'deprecated'. For example, the 1.5 section often says
>> "is  deprecated" or "has been deprecated", when what they mean is "will
>> be removed", which is what the other sections generally tend to say.
>> Some in section 1.6 say a feature "will be deprecated".
>
> I'm +1 on this, it essentially inconsistently restates the deprecation
> policy for each item.
>
> Not all deprecations are removals, some are API changes.
>
> I still think that the doc is basically forward looking, so future
> tense should be preserved - I don't think any mention of when the item
> was first deprecated is needed (as I said, that is in the policy and
> does not need to be repeated).  I do think links to sections of
> release notes are useful instead of restating the reasons in full.
>
> On Oct 3, 6:35 am, Russell Keith-Magee <russ...@keith-magee.com>
> wrote:
>> +1. I agree with Paul that "PendingDeprecationWarning" is slightly
>> problematic from a language perspective because we're saying that
>> we're deprecating a feature now, and implementing that by raising a
>> Pending warning. However, I think that's a mild inconsistency I can
>> live with.
>
> regarding PendingDeprecationWarning:
>
> given that the policy is a relatively generous 2 version path, I like
> that PendingDeprecationWarning allows a sort of "soft deprecation".

I'm completely agreed that the 'soft' deprecation is useful. I'm just
complaining about the ambiguity in the language: "We're deprecating
this feature by marking it PendingDeprecation...".

Yours,
Russ Magee %-)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.

Reply via email to