-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi all,

The milestone field came up again in IRC discussion tonight between
Julien and Paul and I -- namely, that it doesn't seem all that useful
and causes noise in Trac.

It might have made sense back when we had more feature-driven releases
and a feature voting process, but as we're (trying to) move towards
date-based releases and we've moved away from feature voting, I don't
see what purpose it serves. Tickets marked "release blocker" must get
fixed before release, any other accepted ticket is always a candidate to
get fixed if someone works on it in time. Milestone doesn't add anything
but noise.


Julien already raised this topic a while back [1] and Luke more or less
agreed. Can we just go ahead and remove the field, or does somebody want
to present an impassioned defense of its usefulness (in which case you
should explain what it means, which tickets should get a milestone set,
who should set it, and under what conditions it should be removed or
bumped)?

Thanks,

Carl

[1]
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_thread/thread/bf7da09f1f5881dc/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk5393IACgkQ8W4rlRKtE2eVTgCgrAS6xav1CDdbzwIdBF1MHy3M
G4AAnRDATInx+eFLqWlj6czhFUeT+49x
=a3GB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.

Reply via email to