On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <ja...@jacobian.org> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:38 AM, David Zhou <da...@nodnod.net> wrote: >> The specific number of point releases to remain compatible with can >> probably be quibbled over, but I think the point is that maintaining >> across the entirety of 1.x releases when point releases take this long >> can be untenable for good forward momentum. > > I'm pretty annoyed that you think that the policy is to maintain > backwards compatibility "across the entirety of 1.x releases" because, > well, that's not the policy. This is documented; see > http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/internals/release-process/.
You're right, of course, and I should've fact checked orokusaki's assertion that that was the current policy. So I'll retract my previous statements -- those are only applicable given the policy stated in orokusaki's email. -- dz -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
