On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Taylor Marshall <taylor.paul.marsh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Tom X. Tobin <tomxto...@tomxtobin.com> > wrote: >> None of this means that I think the core development process should >> change. (Well, besides my fervent desire that they officially adopted >> git — and yes, I do believe it *would* make a difference, centralized >> "official" branch and all — but that's a discussion for another time >> and a few beers.) >> > > You might be able to make a case on the whole DVCS thing in general, > but I'm not sure why any particular flavor is necessarily *the* choice > (i.e. the whole git vs mercurial vs bazaar holy war).
There's a *huge* difference between git and the other DVCSs (completely different model), but let's save that for another time. :-) >> So ... who has a GitHub account and some neat code to look at? :-) >> > > There's already a unofficial mirror on GitHub which is maintained by jezdez: > > http://github.com/django/django > > Doesn't that solve the "make it easier to branch and track upstream > changes" thing? No, because it doesn't address ultimately pushing back up from the DVCS-using developers; git makes me loathe submitting patch files to Trac. But gah, again, I'd rather address the DVCS issue another time. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
