It's a disaster from the maintenance view point. If it were not so, then people would not be proposing to refactor the settings as has been made in Pinax, or from multiple posts so many times.
This is nothing new. Many people dislikes that kind of configuration, of the same that many people hates java by its fu**ing XML config. files. On 10 mar, 13:49, Russell Keith-Magee <freakboy3...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Joan Miller <pelok...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Whatever configuration system using variables of a language is a > > disaster and it's going not maintainable as has been showed in Django. > > That's a pretty wild assertion to make without any evidence, and it's > completely contrary to my personal experience. Care to back it up? In > what way has Django demonstrated that using a programming language for > configuration files is a disaster? > > Yours, > Russ Magee %-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
