On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Malcolm Tredinnick <malc...@pointy-stick.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 14:48 -0500, Jeremy Dunck wrote: ... >> I'm aware of ticket #7539, but would prefer to keep the scope narrower >> and ask the hopefully-useful question-- is #9308 a bug? If so, I'd >> like to close it for 1.1. >> >> In summary, #9308 describes a situation where B has a nullable FK to >> A, and an instance of A is being deleted. Currently, any B's related >> to A also get deleted. ... > In the case of #9308, specifically, I think setting the related pointers > to NULL would be a better solution, but I'm not sure if it's considered > a fundamental change in behaviour, inconsistent with what we're doing > now.
Would any other committers chime in here? Is #9308 a bug? I realize I can do some fancy work on pre_delete, but this seems like something we should settle. :-/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
