There was some talk on this list about updating the django book a few weeks ago. There were three people who had manifested interest in obtaining updated documentation. I don't know if they did anything about it, though.
I do know that there are a few inconsistencies in the main site documentation that I wanted to address. >From what I gather, the documentation effort have been mostly voluntary and not well organized. For example, I don't think there is a mailing list for documentation feedback. People like you seem to pop in from time to time, ask a few questions and then leave. If someone who had been involved in the project for longer wants to disprove me, I'd be glad to take it back. But all of the above have been my impression so far. 2009/1/16 adrian_nye <adrian...@gmail.com> > > I'm an experienced technical writer (10 years at O'Reilly, author of > several programming books that have done well, editor of others). > > I'm now doing Django programming, one site completed and a second on > the way. > I'd like to contribute to the doc if there's interest in some help > from an expert writer but non-expert django programmer. > > I have found that writing during the learning process has produced my > best work > since I have the same questions and problems that newbies have. > > Not that the docs are bad, on the contrary. But I think they need to > be better for Django to compete with all the established choices. > > > > > -- Remove the roadblocks --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
