On 26 Dez., 08:54, "Adam Findley" <drfind...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The real tragedy here is that the Django Template system is great, but
> it's name is "tightly coupled" to the Django Project.
>
> I think DTL is a great and common standard and what people will be looking
> for.
>
> What's wrong with template::dtl or template::perlDTL? People are
> going to recognize it for what it is now that DTL is the common name
> for the django template library.
Sadly it can't start with Template::, since Template::Toolkit owns
that and I won't impose on their namespace. DTL alone is too short and
perlDTL sounds kind of redundent.
I'm kind of thinking about Dotiac::DTL for now and just treating
Dotiac as a name, cause I like it. Can't decide if the "o" is spoken
short or long..
> This should be easier than naming a kid.
You would think so... :)
Kind of different question: Why is there no {% else %} in {% ifchanged
%}, I think it might be a help to some people.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
