On 12/8/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not sure I'd be a fan of a completely automated mechanism - Django > has a certain sense of style and finess that isn't conveyed by simply > aggregating all updates into a single message.
The intent of my first message was to propose a partially automated update, not a completely automated one -- where the author has the choice to edit very little or get a bit more elaborate as time permits. Something with a straight forward and easy to put together format. And something that, with very little editing and human input, would still be a worthwhile and useful update. > As always, it's easy to propose a technical solution, but ultimately > what we need is a warm body - and they're a lot harder to come by. If > you're volunteering to be that warm body, you're welcome to help out. I was volunteering. But it's also nice to hear feedback on whether the whole endeavor sounds worth it, or if the general format sounds good, etc. Or even if Clint is just taking a break and plans on coming back. Or if there are a few people interested in helping so we all can do rotations and it's not such a burden on one person each week. Thanks, Rob --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
