On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 03:57 -0700, Simon G. wrote: > Ok, my reading of the general consensus here is that everyone thinks a > BinaryField is a good idea, so I've kept #2417 as accepted, with the > patch needing a few improvements. > Is this BinaryField the BLOB variety or the BINARY/VARBINARY variety?
I think Jacob expressed a preference for BinaryField allowing lots of data and SmallBinaryField allowing the user to set the max size with a parameter, and I think that's probably the right way to go to remain consistent with what's already there. Todd --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
