Malcolm Tredinnick wrote: > I'd been slowly arriving at the same solution for a related set of > problems. I was going to whack in another optional (fourth) argument to > the tuple
That was actually the second part of my proposal :-) >, but, you're right that a function call here makes things a > bit easier. But I fail to see why having patterns as functions is easier... Fourth parameter in a tuple is backwards compatible while url() is not. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
