Finally! I've been waiting :) On 8/23/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How To Be Sexy, Rule 1: The word "manipulator" has really got to go. > > Thoughts/comments/suggestions on Joseph's plan below, and on Brant's > plan in Trac? >
I know you want to get rid of the concept of "Manipulator". So two things: 1. I will think very hard of alternate ways of doing this. 2. Currently I think the idea of the "Manipulator" is really quite great. It allows you to define, in a simple way, a Form process. But also, the whole idea of the manipulator means that the "manipulation" of an object is in the "model" space, essentially, and not in the "view" space. Maybe it's a philosophic question, but I see it best defined in the "model" space because then it provides a modular process for views to leverage. Maybe a constructive thing would be to decide what we DON'T like in the current Manipulators system? Personally most of the problems I see, have been sorted out in my proposal. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
