On Sun, 2006-07-23 at 13:02 +0400, Ivan Sagalaev wrote: > First of all: Malcolm, this looks damn cool and very well thought out! > Thank you!
Thanks. > > Malcolm Tredinnick wrote: > > --------------------------- > > 2. "Pythonic" Inheritance > > ---------------------------- > > ... > > > > (in the above classes, Animal > > would have a foreign key reference to the Thing table, similarly for > > Toy). > > Why foreign key? This means that data of one Thing object can be shared > between two different Animal objects. That seems strange, I'd rather > expected it to be one-to-one relation. Good catch. :-) It's a typo; the code is using a variation on OneToOneField there. I have to hack around things a bit for multiple inheritance, since pure Django OneToOneFields want to be primary keys and you can only have one of those. But it is a one-to-one relation to each parent. Regards, Malcolm --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
