I can see a use case where you use 'anonymous' as a kind of temporary account for users who access the site in some way other than the usual means. For example if a user gets an invitation to something, like an evite or calendar, an url could be generated that auto-authenticated them into the 'anonymous' account, which would mean they were authenticated but limited to a temporary anonymous account and would only have limited use. -Mikeal On Jul 14, 2006, at 2:53 PM, SmileyChris wrote:
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
- Re: would is_loggedin be better than is_anonymous? Mikeal Rogers
- Re: would is_loggedin be better than is_anonymous? SmileyChris
- Re: would is_loggedin be better than is_anonym... Gary Wilson
- Re: would is_loggedin be better than is_an... Malcolm Tredinnick