On 1/25/06, Joseph Kocherhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One question though... it doesn't say anything about accessing fields > via the class anymore. Is that still the plan? Article.sites, > Article.reporter, etc would return the field object, and > article_obj.site_set returns a manager.
Yeah, definitely -- that's still planned. I was a bit delete-happy in editing that wiki page. :) > Also, it would be cool if the _set stuff wasn't forced on us, there's > a disconnect between creating an attribute called 'sites' in your > model, and accessing that attribute via 'site_set'. Allowing users to > set the attribute name on both sides would require some trickery, but > it could be done. (I can think of a couple of ways.) That said, I can > live with the '_set' names. Good call about the "sites" thing. Really, that attribute name isn't used at all (from what I can tell)...hmmm. What are your ideas? Adrian -- Adrian Holovaty holovaty.com | djangoproject.com | chicagocrime.org
