On 12/6/05, hugo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One problem I see: the Admin URLs currently can rely on being only > two-level. When the listed changes are in, an app that sit's in > cms.apps.cms will have models in cms.apps.cms.models - so will the URL > be /cms/apps/cms/pages for the Page model? If yes, it won't be as easy > to do relative URLs for those pages and so it might be problematic to > make the admin location-independend like it is now.
Yeah, we'll have to be smart about the relative URLs. It'll still work, though, with a little initial hassle figuring it out. > All this will be a rather large change in API - generic views that > currently use app_label and module_name for example might need changes, > get_module (using the same app_label, module_name stuff) and maybe even > things like the comments stuff (as that references the contenttypes). > Do we want to provide a transition path where the "old" magic stuff > will be kept working for some time? Right -- the generic view infodict will change, and content types will change as well. It's a big change, but it's important to make. Adrian -- Adrian Holovaty holovaty.com | djangoproject.com | chicagocrime.org
