On 12/2/05, Tim Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -1 from me. As a *user*, I would much rather just generate random > content inside of my view code.
I'm surprised this makes you -1 rather than -0; do you hate it that much? :-) > I'd like to point out the cited example > (random photo on Flickr) can't be done with this technique, since this > is baked into the template. It really depends on the site; if you're drawing from a truly large number of random photos, it's not really feasible for the tag; on the other hand, it's perfect for a site which rotates among a small, static number of photos.
