-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Eugene,
> 1) With all due respect I shall remind you that nobody forces to read all 
> posts.
I know, but that's not the case. As you might realise, your one off
off-topic comments can stray the whole discussion towards something
which is totally irrelevant.

> 2) I feel offended when people replace real issues with a stream of 
> meaningless buzz-words using evasive rhetoric when asked to explain the 
> meaning of those words --- "It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' 
> is." (c) William Jefferson Clinton.
Heh, AJAX, as you might have noticed is mostly all buzzword crap, but
again many not-so-knowledgeable developers would choose a framework
purely on the basis of buzzword-compliance. So what if James wants
Django to be buzzword compliant too? None can deny its importance in
today's world ;)

[snip]
> 4) Let's return to the topic and discuss it in constructive manner. While 
> you chided me I actually tried it (see my other post).
Yeah, but that was in a different thread, and I thought it was good to
stop THIS thread.

> 5) I would be honored if you share you position with us on Django Ajax. I 
> noticed that you voted +1 for Ajax in Django 1.0 --- I am sure you have 
> something interesting to say on this topic, if you feel so strongly for it.
Yeah surely. I have discussed about this AJAX stuff at length on IRC and
my preference is shared by a lot of people and has been posted on the
list too. What I feel is that I know Django ``supports'' AJAX today
itself in a way that it doesn't restrict / stop the user from using some
third party AJAX library. But what I want in 1.0 is a loosely coupled,
minimal AJAX library + API which in one hand will enable the developer
to do some XHR stuff fairly easily and also on the other hand won't stop
him from using another full blown library if he wishes. Correct me if I
am wrong, may be what I said is not much ``buzzword compliant''. :)
Regards,
BG

- --
Baishampayan Ghose
b.ghose at gmail.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDe0i9Qkk0lIY2G3QRAhFLAKCeeBQGbym9F6RHqYPP4frirJCdBwCfTyMY
DLlhVEgSQbXgTG/MAuAR/Pg=
=6qmS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to