Does the following help :- URL :- http://lmap.co.nr/Amazon1.htm
In the tree, one can browse amazon catalogues based on the browse id. On reaching the item level (marked with red dots) one can click on it to view details such as price, image etc. Eugene Lazutkin wrote: > Mochikit is an excellent framework. I like it a lot. But... While it solves > a lot of low-level problems, it doesn't provide any facilities for widgets. > Dojo solves widget packaging. I think that Django/Ajax should use a > high-level foundation: widgets, shared client/server objects, and so on. > Probably templates should be involved as well, e.g., some specialized > template tags, which define Ajax components. > > > "Robert Wittams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Eugene Lazutkin wrote: > >> http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/AJAX --- it lists exactly one > >> implementation done by Eric Moritz. It uses prototype.js. Current state > >> of > >> this project is "abandoned" --- no changes were made in a long time. His > >> solution provides uniform access to models using existing Django > >> framework. > >> All dispatching is done by a middleware component. There are no > >> provisions > >> for widgets. > >> > >> I don't know if anybody else is doing/planning something related to > >> Django/Ajax. > >> > >> I explored Django Ajax possibility some time ago. After evaluation of > >> several different frameworks I decided that Dojo provides the best > >> foundation. Coincidentally Eric came to the same conclusion: > >> http://eric.themoritzfamily.com/2005/07/29/django-ajax-and-dojo/ > >> > > > > I looked around and reached a similar conclusion wrt Dojo. Although > > Mochikit seems ok - it just doesn't seem to do very much. > > > > rjw > > > >
