+1 from me. "Adrian Holovaty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/15/05, Sune Kirkeby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Then one could put "def gnah" in MODULE_LEVEL instead of > "def _module_gnah" in the model, also exceptions and the > module_constants that cannot be auto-deduced could > go in there... That's a great idea. It would make it more explicit that module-level magic is happening, and it would remove the need for the ugly "_module" prefixes. And it can be backwards-compatible (for at least a short while), because we could support both approaches. What do people think?
