You will continue to see it using jrun_iis6_wildcard. That's not incorrect (but potentially confusing, yes).
/charlie From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ajas Mohammed Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2013 12:01 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] wsconfig - CF 9.0.1 Windows 2008 R2 IIS 7 Again thanks. I think I am guessing that the correct answer to this is 75 because of different application pools. I could be wrong though, like you said better to do practical test and figure out what happens. One thing I found which is weird "I have jrun_iis6_wildcard instead of jrun_iis7_wildcard", this is really surprising to me. We had iis6 comparability initially and then removed it and re installed cf 9.0.1 & ran connector again for all sites. Thanks, <Ajas Mohammed /> iUseDropbox( <http://db.tt/63Lvone9> http://db.tt/63Lvone9) http://ajashadi.blogspot.com We cannot become what we need to be, remaining what we are. No matter what, find a way. Because thats what winners do. You can't improve what you don't measure. Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of high intention, sincere effort, intelligent direction and skillful execution; it represents the wise choice of many alternatives. On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Charlie Arehart <[email protected]> wrote: Thanks for the kind regards. As for your question, that's something I've always wondered myself. :-) In fact, you will see that on the Adobe blog entry about that maxworkerthreads bug (from a few years ago) that I had asked this question specifically, and I never got an answer. I always wanted to test it, but never got around to it. If you may do some testing determine it, please do let us know. To quote "Dances with Wolves", I'd consider that a "good trade". :-) /charlie From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ajas Mohammed Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 10:53 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] wsconfig - CF 9.0.1 Windows 2008 R2 IIS 7 Thank you sir. You are the best!!!!!!!. Do you see any issues with these separate folders? Plus what about the whole logic about concurrent requests and IIS bug? In this case without the fix (maxworkerthreads=25) and default worker process (1) and seperate application pools for all sites plus 2nd folder and 3 folder as well, does it mean this 1. 25 default setting for concurrent req (bug) x for all sites and 25 x for 2nd folder and 25 x for 3rd folder = 75 or 2. 25 max requests for all sites , 2nd folder site, 3 folder site = 25 max requests overall Thanks, <Ajas Mohammed /> ------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by FusionLink <http://www.fusionlink.com> ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com -------------------------------------------------------------
