> On Aug 20, 2016, at 10:36 AM, Apostolos Syropoulos via illumos-discuss > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Are your priorities so messed up you're focused on some code and not the >> behavior? If you want KMS, go write it or fund it, but don't expect >> collaboration if those are the terms. >> > > You are not answering the question! My question is very simple: Illumos > is the ONLY OS that does not provide KMS. We need that or else soon it would > not be possible to use a computer monitor with OpenIndiana, etc. This was > documented almost 3 years ago: > > https://homepages.laas.fr/matthieu/talks/mh-fosdem-2013.pdf > > Now the question is: When are going to have KMS in Illumos? Do you have > any plans to start working on this?
Do you? Yes, we can use a KMS implementation. No, we don't need it so bad that we're are willing to put up with a harassing, abusive individual in order to have it. We have standards here, if not (yet) as a group then certainly as individuals. /dale
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
------------------------------------------- illumos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182180/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/182180/21175430-2e6923be Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21175430&id_secret=21175430-6a77cda4 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
