On 2022-03-06, at 22:30, Maksym Tulyuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dear Anton, > > Let’s looks at the facts not references to "de facto as a civil society > movement” under Russian law: > As far as I know the official list of ENOG founders does neither exist nor > publish on the website enog.org > The domain enog.org is owned by RIPE NCC > 1st ENOG meeting started with the words "Dear colleagues, I am glad to > welcome you at the 1st international meeting of ENOG–the Eurasian Forum of > Internet Operators – co-hosted by RIPE NCC and the Coordination Center for > TLD RU” - no reference to any civil society movement. > Each ENOG had a list of hosts and sponsors and I have never seen any "civil > society movement” you mentioned in these lists > RIPE NCC is located in Amsterdam, the Kingdom of the Netherlands i.e. it is > under Dutch (not Russian) law > Based on the facts above I assume RIPE NCC has all necessary rights to do > what many of us is asking: cancelling ENOG for good.
I do see option two: A permanent ban on all participants from Russia and Belarus in future ENOG events. Would that work? Let’s have a honest discussion. Also, as ENOG seems to be comprised of all the countries that used to be under Moscow sphere of influence, I wonder if Finland should join. > Yours sincerely, > Maksym Tulyuk > Former ENOG PC member
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.enog.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
