Hi,
Michael Meeks wrote on 2011-11-28 16:45:
Cool ! :-) having said that, I'd prefer it to be tried on a less
high-volume list, where we could see the utility of attracting more
participants (personally).
I wanted to start on a high-volume list to see the impact. But looking
at the replies, I think we should indeed vary from list to list. For
discuss@ maybe it is not desired...
Anyways, which lists would you like to start trying it on?
To me a huge benefit of not reply-to mangling is to allow new people to
interact with the list (and get replies to their mail) without being
subscribed; that provides an easy on-ramp into the project, and
IMHO that causes lots of problem. I see myself purging files from the
archive because people did not know they were posting in public. And I
see moderators moderating lots of messages... both not desirable. ;-)
But maybe I'm exaggerating here, and giving it a try definitely shows
the results, so let's do it.
Of course, I would expect it to be opposed by people who are already
members of a given community, and like not getting personal replies to
messages in threads they start.
I will adjust my filters soon, because getting replies in the inbox
instead of in the list folder is annoying. But, ah, I think there is no
real ideal solution to things. :)
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger <[email protected]>
Board of Directors at The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
