Charles-H. Schulz wrote: > > No it doesn't. > Of course it does. Maybe you don't use it or don't know how to do it. But don't say it doesn't.
Charles-H. Schulz wrote: > > But I think we're also missing the point if -let's say > we were to design a brand new office file format that embeds or does > not embed fonts- why should anyone be using it? Choosing a format > that's not the dominant format is already a reasoned choice, oftentimes > an act of departure from the dominant player, and sometimes a political > act. I think you are missing the point: it's not simply a matter of the embedded fonts. If the brand new file format that you are creating wants to attract users it can never have less features than the one it wants to replace. Or at least it can not miss critical features. Even if people want to switch for "political" reasons, I'm sure they don't want their work crippled... -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Font-Embedding-in-ODF-was-RE-ANN-ODF-1-2-Candidate-OASIS-Standard-Enters-60-Day-Public-Review-tp3106577p3107831.html Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
