Hallo Christian, Am 07.12.2010 01:54, schrieb Christian Lohmaier:
>> told that my script causes too much server load (which I can´t prove >> or disprove), > > No, you misunderstood/misinterpreted. I was telling that I want a > solution that can be served statically, in a cached copy. A pure > php-server-based solution doesn't do that. Ah ok. Sorry, I do not understand too much of this technical stuff. Isn´t caching a method to reduce the load? And generally, is caching really so important? Aren´t there trillions of pure php-server-based solutions out in the web? >> which may be a reason for not considering the >> integration of this script. > Well, I'm kind of disappointed to read that, since you're well aware > that I implemented a download-selector page modeled after your > proposal on the silverstripe test-install at pumbaa already Hm? I am talking about my idea of temporarily integrating my script on http://www.documentfoundation.org, not the CMS. And I am thinking of possible reasons, why this might be a bad idea. And this makes you disappointed? :-/ :-) ;-) > I just didn't find the time to put it up on the real site until now. Time of volunteers is one of our main problems. I already mentioned in the posting you are answering to: "There is no one to blame for that, since all are volunteers." So, thanks a lot for spending some time last night! :-) Stefan -- LibreOffice - Die Freiheit nehm' ich mir! -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
