On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:09:11 -0500, Rich Pieri wrote: > If the display is physically large enough to make use of that > resolution. UHD at less than about 35" at 16:9 and everything will be > too small to comfortably see without magnifying to compensate. At which > point the UHD screen is a waste of money.
I don't agree. Even if you can't easily resolve the individual pixels, the higher density improves the definition and may allow you to e. g. use a smaller font or smaller icons and be able to read them as easily. -- Robert Krawitz <[email protected]> *** MIT Engineers A Proud Tradition http://mitathletics.com *** Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- http://ProgFree.org Project lead for Gutenprint -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net "Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works." --Eric Crampton _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
