[quote="namduc, post:6, topic:10889"] after that i got the same result with a model onnx running on onnxruntime [/quote] It might be that onnxruntime was able to use hardware resources the most efficient way and improving of the inference time more is possible but might be hard. And TVM get the same perfect result. It's hard to say without looking into the model. Is it publically available model? Does it have more conv layers or matmul/dense?
[quote="namduc, post:6, topic:10889"] and the results didn’t improve much [/quote] Is it the same model as in the beginning? If it is the same - there is a progress comparing to different tvm results. From 3.4s to 0.5 seconds. As for quote of tsv file - I see a part from 10000 trials to 20000. Probably tuning had to be stopped on that 1000th trial or early. At the same time I am pretty sure that if we take to the first lines, results should be improved significantly during tuning. --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/compiling-model-with-target-llvm-not-faster/10889/7) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/email/unsubscribe/a79be5c4b3aeb6108ce1de2cce108ca83738404308220e20b2d1290d0d03c8e3).
