The sort of case I'm thinking of is when a mutation takes place, the mutated part of the graph won't have types associated with it (at least, not until type_infer is called on the expression again). It's not immediately obvious to me whether that's happening in this example. But now I've thought about it more, that's not a bug, it would just be a requirement that you manually propagate the type info in your mutator.
--- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/same-shape-pattern/7012/11) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.ai/email/unsubscribe/75c88f1901eca57ed92b89e47172f149e5007ee17beb2aa4f7a4c681a84a9ac1).
