@hht -- thank you very much.  

So is this mean, we can not enforce parallelism to GraphRuntime?  If I 
understand correctly, it looks like GraphRuntime does not run add1 and add2 in 
parallel? 

Basically, I am wondering if there is a mechanism to enforce parallelism to 
GraphRuntime from the higher level passes from Relay/TVM?  For example 
embedding scheduling (parallelism information) into the graph json file, and 
enforce that schedule into GraphRuntime? 
 
[quote="hht, post:2, topic:6572"]
Each subgraph has been made a fused function. So I guess the former pass bind 
the thread and it is not suggested to explore it in graph runtime. The graph 
runtime use an static memory allocation strategy and will be replaced by Relay 
VM.
[/quote]





---
[Visit 
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/execution-order-of-operators-at-runtime-in-tvm/6572/3)
 to respond.

You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.

To unsubscribe from these emails, [click 
here](https://discuss.tvm.ai/email/unsubscribe/2062c095b9c4ea2277072c9ca194d73cc88d716aaaa05ab307c477845be6af32).

Reply via email to