QNNPACK is for ARM, whereas VNNI instructions are for Intel. So, not exactly that reason. But, the underlying statement might still be the case, that we dont have good TVM schedules.
Regarding schedules to get same speedup as QNNPACK, we can write assembly implementation in TVM schedule and match QNNPACK implementation. There will be some issues like QNNPACK quantized conv2d might be different than Relay conv2d in terms of compute etc. But, yes, it should be possible to get as good as QNNPACK (and better). For TVM Schedules, I would suggest going through tutorials here - https://tvm.apache.org/docs/tutorials/index.html --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/is-there-any-speed-comparison-of-quantization-on-cpu/6256/39) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.ai/email/unsubscribe/cfa52aa9f0be8fd0eebee6ab1358800fdd89b39a3b15f11059afb280d226c568).
