Now we're back to why David doesn't particularly like that:

> Today I used the parent/child relationships e.g.
> https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T128073 but I don't think it's the
> proper approach because when I classify tickets I don't necessarily have a
> parent task ready.


If the categories are ones you come back to again and again, the parent
task would only have to be created once. And I could imagine a grandparent
task of "Fix Search Stuff" which would make it easy to find the right
parent task.


Trey Jones
Software Engineer, Discovery
Wikimedia Foundation

On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Trey Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> For autocomplete, what about sticking with a department/team/issue
>> format: e.g., Discovery-Search-BadWeight.. or they could all get a personal
>> "_Tag" prefix: _Tag-dcausse-search-badweight. That's super unwieldy, but
>> avoids autocomplete collisions for everything else.
>>
>
> Autocomplete is per-word, so that sample would come up for dc, sea, bad,
> etc. For example, typing "back" in the upper-right search bar brings up all
> the xxx-backlog projects.
>
>
>> However, it sounds like we could consider ignoring the "no tracking
>> tasks" directive, at least within Discovery. (Now I am advocating going
>> against the advice given since no one seems to be advocating for it.)
>>
>>
> As long as you don't call it a tracking task, I doubt anyone would even
> notice in order to complain. If it seems like it would solve the issue, I
> would support that. The whole "no tracking tasks" rule seemed to be a
> reaction (or over-reaction?) to something going on in bugzilla, so until we
> see actual problems in phab, I'm in favor of reasonable experimentation.
>
> Kevin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discovery mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/discovery
>
>
_______________________________________________
discovery mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/discovery

Reply via email to