Hi,
attached is a patch for this
Cheers,
Andre'
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 13:43 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When compiling DirectFB in single app. mode, fusion_reactor_free ()
> doesn't call to pthread_mutex_destroy( &reactor->globals_lock ); Is it
> OK?
>
> -Ilyes
>
> DirectResult
> fusion_reactor_free (FusionReactor *reactor)
> {
> D_ASSERT( reactor != NULL );
>
> // D_ASSUME( reactor->destroyed );
>
> reactor->reactions = NULL;
>
> pthread_mutex_destroy( &reactor->reactions_lock );
>
> D_FREE( reactor );
>
> return DR_OK;
> }
> _______________________________________________
> directfb-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
>From a9fd7633656b00777cf9d0afd01bc87db6c4e3c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?utf-8?q?Andr=C3=A9=20Draszik?= <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 13:02:39 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] fusion: fix mem leak in single application mode
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Signed-off-by: André Draszik <[email protected]>
---
lib/fusion/reactor.c | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/fusion/reactor.c b/lib/fusion/reactor.c
index 580f3b0..b1c4af3 100644
--- a/lib/fusion/reactor.c
+++ b/lib/fusion/reactor.c
@@ -1823,6 +1823,9 @@ fusion_reactor_free (FusionReactor *reactor)
pthread_mutex_destroy( &reactor->reactions_lock );
+ reactor->globals = NULL;
+ pthread_mutex_destroy( &reactor->globals_lock );
+
D_FREE( reactor );
return DR_OK;
--
1.6.3.3
_______________________________________________
directfb-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
