Re: shared - i need it to be useful

[ag0aep6g via Digitalmars-d]

On 17.10.18 20:46, Manu wrote:
struct NotThreadsafe
{
   int x;
   void local()
   {
     ++x; // <- invalidates the method below, you violate the other
function's `shared` promise
   }
   void notThreadsafe() shared
   {
     atomicIncrement(&x);
   }
}

In the `shared` method you'd get a nice error when attempting `++x;`, 
because it's not thread-safe. With your proposal, it's just as unsafe in 
`local`, but you don't get any help from the compiler in spotting it. 
`local` is effectively `@trusted` without being marked as such.