Re: `shared`...

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 1 October 2018 at 02:29:40 UTC, Manu wrote:
I feel like I don't understand the design...
mutable -> shared should work the same as mutable -> const... 
because
surely that's safe?

Nope. Consider.

struct A {
   A* a;
}

void foo(shared A* a) {
    a.a = new shared(A))();
}

Now you have effectively made a.a accessible as a mutable when it 
is shared.