On Thursday, 26 March 2026 at 22:48:22 UTC, Kapendev wrote:
https://forum.dlang.org/thread/[email protected]
I think theres better ways to do it then this gist but
intrusive lists
Im unsure what problems you have with the anti-work keywords,
but you have at least three options with what ive seen:
smart handles: mixin+index, limits you to 1 array but elements
know where root is implicitly
add indexes to your types: assume the root is index 0 or 1,
then you should be able to generate a range from the array
add an index array to your datastructure.
It's a binary tree, where the "indexes" are keys, not exact
locations, so that won't work.
I think I'll try again tomorrow, and also write a DIP to get
around this issue, likely some change to the `opApply` function
itself.
In the meanwhile, I might just add some Rust-style foreach with a
template and a lambda.