devl  

Messages by Thread

• [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16923 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/store Martin Nyhus
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16923 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/store Matthew Toseland
• [freenet-dev] current trunk Robert Hailey
• [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16942 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Florent Daignière
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16942 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node David Sowder (Zothar)
• [freenet-dev] French translation update for 1097 Julien Cornuwel
• [freenet-dev] r16886 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Robert Hailey
  • [freenet-dev] r16886 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] r16886 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Robert Hailey
  • [freenet-dev] r16886 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Robert Hailey
  • [freenet-dev] r16886 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] r16886 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Robert Hailey
  • [freenet-dev] r16886 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] r16886 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] htl problem was r16886 Robert Hailey
  • [freenet-dev] htl problem was r16886 Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Trying all peers - HTL problem was Re: htl problem was r16886 Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Trying all peers - HTL problem was Re: htl problem was r16886 Robert Hailey
  • [freenet-dev] Trying all peers - HTL problem was Re: htl problem was r16886 Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Trying all peers - HTL problem was Re: htl problem was r16886 Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] r16886 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] r16886 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Robert Hailey
  • [freenet-dev] r16886 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] r16886 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Robert Hailey
  • [freenet-dev] r16886 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Robert Hailey
  • [freenet-dev] r16886 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Robert Hailey
  • [freenet-dev] r16886 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] r16886 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Robert Hailey
  • [freenet-dev] r16886 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] r16886 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Robert Hailey
• [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16875 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/fcp Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16875 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/fcp Robert Hailey
• [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16871 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16871 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Robert Hailey
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16871 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
• [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7 build 1097 Matthew Toseland
• [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16858 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http Matthew Toseland
• [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16856 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16856 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http Florent Daignière
• [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] Verification of r16847 on emu Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] Verification of r16847 on emu Florent Daignière
• [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16839 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16839 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Florent Daignière
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16839 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
• [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16837 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16837 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Robert Hailey
• [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16833 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16833 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Robert Hailey
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16833 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16833 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Robert Hailey
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16833 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node David Sowder
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16833 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16833 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
• [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16826 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16826 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Robert Hailey
• [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16817 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: node support/math Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16817 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: node support/math Robert Hailey
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16817 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: node support/math Matthew Toseland
• [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16825 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node David Sowder
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16825 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16825 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Robert Hailey
• [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16834 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Florent Daignière
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16834 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Florent Daignière
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16834 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16834 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Florent Daignière
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16834 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Robert Hailey
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16834 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node David Sowder
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16834 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16834 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node David Sowder (Zothar)
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16834 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16834 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] r16834 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Robert Hailey
  • [freenet-dev] r16834 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] r16834 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Robert Hailey
  • [freenet-dev] r16834 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node David Sowder (Zothar)
  • [freenet-dev] r16834 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] r16834 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Florent Daignière
  • [freenet-dev] r16834 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node David Sowder
  • [freenet-dev] r16834 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Florent Daignière
  • [freenet-dev] r16834 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node David Sowder
  • [freenet-dev] r16834 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Florent Daignière
  • [freenet-dev] r16834 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node David Sowder
  • [freenet-dev] r16834 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
• [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16832 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Florent Daignière
• [freenet-dev] r16833 && r16834 Robert Hailey
  • [freenet-dev] r16833 && r16834 Florent Daignière
• [freenet-dev] r16837 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Robert Hailey
  • [freenet-dev] r16837 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Florent Daignière
• [freenet-dev] r16821 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: node support/math Robert Hailey
• [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16775 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: clients/http crypt io l10n node node/fcp Florent Daigni?re
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16775 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: clients/http crypt io l10n node node/fcp Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16775 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: clients/http crypt io l10n node node/fcp Florent Daignière
• [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16803 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
• [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16802 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
• [freenet-dev] What happened here? was Re: [freenet-cvs] r16802 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
• [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7 build 1096 Matthew Toseland
• [freenet-dev] Getting rid of Entry Point Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Getting rid of Entry Point Matthew Toseland
• [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7 build 1095 Matthew Toseland
• [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7 build 1094 Matthew Toseland
• [freenet-dev] closestLocation vulnerability Robert Hailey
  • [freenet-dev] closestLocation vulnerability Matthew Toseland
• [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16756 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16756 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Robert Hailey
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16756 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Robert Hailey
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16756 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
• [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16754 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16754 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Robert Hailey
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16754 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
• [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16746 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16746 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Florent Daignière
• [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16744 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16744 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Robert Hailey
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16744 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
• [freenet-dev] r16751 - tags/Thaw [email protected]
• [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16733 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16733 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r16733 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node Robert Hailey
• [freenet-dev] r16740 - sendAsync in CHKInsertSender Robert Hailey
  • [freenet-dev] r16740 - sendAsync in CHKInsertSender Matthew Toseland
• [freenet-dev] Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] PROPOSAL: Don't calculate the overall key until ALL of a splitfile has been inserted Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] PROPOSAL: Don't calculate the overall key until ALL of a splitfile has been inserted Volodya
  • [freenet-dev] PROPOSAL: Don't calculate the overall key until ALL of a splitfile has been inserted Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] One tunnel per request: justification Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] One tunnel per request: justification Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] One tunnel per request: justification Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] One tunnel per request: justification Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] One tunnel per request: justification Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] One tunnel per request: justification Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] One tunnel per request: justification Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] One tunnel per request: justification Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] One tunnel per request: justification Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] One tunnel per request: justification Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] One tunnel per request: justification Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] One tunnel per request: justification Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] One tunnel per request: justification Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Predecessor sampling and tunnel padding was Re: One tunnel per request: justification Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Predecessor sampling and tunnel padding was Re: One tunnel per request: justification Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] Predecessor sampling and tunnel padding was Re: One tunnel per request: justification Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Predecessor sampling and tunnel padding was Re: One tunnel per request: justification Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] Predecessor sampling and tunnel padding was Re: One tunnel per request: justification Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Predecessor sampling and tunnel padding was Re: One tunnel per request: justification Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] Predecessor sampling and tunnel padding was Re: One tunnel per request: justification Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Predecessor sampling and tunnel padding was Re: One tunnel per request: justification Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] Predecessor sampling and tunnel padding was Re: One tunnel per request: justification Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Why getting rid of HTL is bad was Re: Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Why getting rid of HTL is bad was Re: Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] Why getting rid of HTL is bad was Re: Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Why getting rid of HTL is bad was Re: Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] Tunnels vs premix routing was Re: Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Tunnels vs premix routing was Re: Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] Tunnels vs premix routing was Re: Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Tunnels vs premix routing was Re: Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] Tunnels vs premix routing was Re: Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Tunnels vs premix routing was Re: Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] Tunnels vs premix routing was Re: Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Tunnels vs premix routing was Re: Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] Tunnels vs premix routing was Re: Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] New full-probabilistic HTL was Tunnels vs premix routing was Re: Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Michael Tänzer
  • [freenet-dev] Why we decide once whether to decrement at HTL 10 Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] New full-probabilistic HTL was Tunnels vs premix routing was Re: Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] New full-probabilistic HTL was Tunnels vs premix routing was Re: Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Tunnels vs premix routing was Re: Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing was Re: Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing was Re: Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing was Re: Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing was Re: Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing was Re: Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing was Re: Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing was Re: Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing was Re: Vulnerability in inserting the manifest before finishing Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] Weighted coin is better was Re: Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Weighted coin is better was Re: Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] Weighted coin is better was Re: Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Weighted coin is better was Re: Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] Weighted coin is better was Re: Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Weighted coin is better was Re: Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] Weighted coin is better was Re: Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Weighted coin is better was Re: Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] Weighted coin is better was Re: Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Weighted coin is better was Re: Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] Weighted coin is better was Re: Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Weighted coin is better was Re: Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] Weighted coin is better was Re: Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Weighted coin is better was Re: Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] Weighted coin is better was Re: Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] Weighted coin is better was Re: Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Weighted coin is better was Re: Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] Weighted coin is better was Re: Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Weighted coin is better was Re: Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] Weighted coin is better was Re: Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing Michael Rogers
  • [freenet-dev] Weighted coin is better was Re: Moving to a simple coin was Re: Tunnels vs premix routing Matthew Toseland
  • [freenet-dev] How to deal with inserts with weighted coin? Matthew Toseland

• Earlier messages
• Later messages