Hi, I think such a device would be awesome! If combined with the icicles app, it could make using darknet very convenient.
This could also serve as darknet peer to a node which runs on another computer. Steve Dougherty <[email protected]> writes: > To run Freenet it'd need robust storage and a fair amount of RAM; when > I ran a Freenet node on a Raspberry Pi 2 (1 GiB RAM; MicroSD card > rootfs and USB ports) with Freenet installed to a USB hard drive, the > USB drive kept disconnecting (maybe due to flakiness under load?), > causing filesystem corruption and kernel panics. When I moved the > Freenet installation to the MicroSD card, not long after the > filesystem started to, if memory serves, refuse to accept writes. Since this is a problem we’ve seen in the past, and since this will be an always-on device (many¹ USB hard drives have problems with sustained load, and many¹ SD cards aren’t built for constaint rewriting), I’d suggest using 512 MiB of pure ram-storage. Then we could guarantee that freenet would not create strain on the device. ¹: It doesn’t matter that there are ones which work well if we cannot guarantee that users will have one which works well. > So whatever this does use it'll need good storage one way or > another. I had some flavor of https://nextthing.co/pages/chip in mind, > but haven't tested running Freenet on such a system yet. Either way it > couldn't handle something memory-heavy like Sone, and maybe not WoT > either. (For reference my Freenet node with both of those is currently > sitting at about 2 GiB resident.) Hopefully a base node would work. My base nodes without WoT work well with roughly 500MiB of memory and just about 10% load (on a 2x800MHz system). Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein ohne es zu merken
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
