Am Freitag, 9. M?rz 2012, 23:14:04 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > On Friday 09 Mar 2012 23:02:49 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 7. M?rz 2012, 22:14:39 schrieb Thomas Sachau: > > > So what is the experience of new users? Install freenet, see automaticly > > > shipped wot+freetalk, try them, see their issues, maybe browse some > > > sites and uninstall freenet again, since things either do rarely work or > > > there is no content. > > > > I think it goes even deeper: The installer fails for many. > > Does it still? If so we need to determine why.
Last week someone in IRC had problems again. And I think the installer has to be as simple and straightforward as possible. What I saw in the chinese freenet installation youtube movie was much too complex. 6 steps in the installer (or so) and then 4 configuration steps (do we really need 2 steps with only 2 buttons on the site?). And then there are firewall and port-forwarding issues. > > Also Freetalk is not integrated with the other parts of freenet. There > > should be attachment options, where the post is only sent once the file > > finished uploading. And lots of other ?small? stuff on the UI side. > > Agreed, as does p0s, but first it has to WORK. Jupp. Any plans about Sone? Best wishes, Arne -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 316 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20120310/15655ac1/attachment.pgp>
