On Wednesday 13 Apr 2011 17:27:40 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 Apr 2011 14:13:29 Ian Clarke wrote:
> > http://freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=383&report=97
> > 
> > These guys did extensive surveys in various countries.  Freenet came out
> > on-top in China.  Might be worth a news story on the website.
> 
> How the hell do we get 5 stars on ease of use *and* on performance, in 
> subjective ratings from Chinese users? IMHO neither is credible.
> 
> Something very fishy here. Is there another Freenet out there? Is the 
> freenet-china still up? I don't get the impression that we have a huge 
> community of chinese speakers on the main Freenet, at least if there is it's 
> somewhat invisible?
> 
> Note that the evaluations from other countries are much lower. And there's no 
> direct analysis of Freenet in their larger paper. Although the Chinese seem 
> to be ideal for Freenet in that they tend to have both home PCs *and* 
> broadband (even if it doesn't generally allow for 24x7 operation as it's 
> usually time limited). Also maybe they're a bit geekier than the rest?
> 
> The spread of evaluations is relatively narrow on most of their graphs mind 
> you ...
> 
> Also, expect trouble from the censors if they read this. E.g. blocking the 
> seednodes... the chinese numbers might just reflect the fact that there have 
> increasingly been difficulties accessing Google lately, and Tor has been 
> mostly blocked - so in terms of objective performance, until the Chinese 
> block our seednodes we may well be the best option for *getting a connection 
> of some kind*.
> 
> I'm not sure how their questionnaire that these numbers are supposedly based 
> on fits with Freenet, it asks about blocked websites... Maybe it's an 
> artefact of the survey design?
> 
http://freenet-china.org/ hasn't been updated since 2003. Maybe they unblocked 
it and filled it with censorware, but I'd expect them to make it look like 
they've updated it in that case ...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110413/ed68cc74/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to