On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Volodya <Volodya at whengendarmesleeps.org>wrote:
> Pseudonymity is a feature when a user wants that. And it is a bug when one > wants > something else. No, giving someone an additional ability is never a "bug", if they don't like it they don't have to use it. > But i see that what is desired is to keep Freetalk "pure". > I have no idea what your definition of "pure" is, or why you think it is desirable. Anonymous systems that lack pseudonymity are a *lot* less useful. > > Pseudonymity is a feature, not a bug. If you don't like it just create a > new > > identity every time. > > I have already explained why creating a new identity each time is > infeasible. > Yeah, because they'd need to solve captchas every time. But if you expect to have any hope of preventing spam in a system that lacks pseudonymity you'd need to do something like that anyway. You're tilting at windmills. Ian. -- Ian Clarke Personal blog: http://blog.locut.us/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110410/88e1bedb/attachment.html>
