On Tuesday 05 Apr 2011 13:19:10 Pouyan Zachar wrote: > [Original message from Pouyan] > >> I wanted to suggest porting already existing "Toadlets" to normal > >> servlets and utilize Apache Struts framework for more simplicity. This > >> would make it easier and more intuitive to design and develop the web > >> interface (fproxy) using JSP pages. However it may not be an easy task > >> to adapt SimpleToadletServer to struts. > >> > [Matthew Said] > > My recollection is servlets are far more complex and we don't use most of > > their features? On the other hand, maybe we do now. More importantly, they > > don't do anything for us in the areas where we really need help - > > specifically, content generation / templating. > > > > Or am I wrong? I'm quite happy to get rid of toadlets and HTMLNode if > > something else is better. > > > > No, you are not wrong, simple Servlets are as complicated as existing > Toadlets in use. What makes it easier is the use of some Java Web > program application such as Apache Struts or Wicket (as Ian > suggested). In case of Apache Struts you can use JSPs as templates > (View) while Struts core is taking care of HTTP requests (Controller) > and Struts forms (Model) are used as data models. Other put you will > have a nice and tidy MVC architecture!
Does that support sending data to clients that don't have javascript? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110405/612ed643/attachment.pgp>
